Monday, December 3, 2007

Imagine Florida without the Keys

Thinking of Florida without the Florida Keys and the Everglades seems impossible but according to Global Development and Environment Institute at Tufts University by 2060, this could be a very likely possibility. According to GDEI's November study called, "Florida and Climate Change: The Cost of Inaction," sea levels are anticipated to rise by 27 inches if Florida doesn't do anything to reduce greenhouse emissions.

Now if the Keys and other popular tourist areas disappear (beaches will be threatened), this will have a significant impact on tourism. As the report points out:

  • Florida will be at least 10 degrees Fahrenheit warmer by 2100, making it hotter and less attractive to tourists (Florida will truly be one hot destination!) during the low and shoulder seasons.
  • There will be fewer places for tourists to visit in the Sunshine State meaning fewer places visiting meaning fewer things purchased. By 2025, GDEI predicts (if nothing is done in Florida to reduce carbon emissions) a $9 billion impact and $40 billion by 2050.
  • Hurricane damage will increase due to hurricane intensity (warmer water temperatures , too.
  • The cost of doing business in Florida will be expensive and this no doubt be passed along to tourists, making Florida an expensive place to vacation and live. Insurance rates will probably rise due to increased hurricane activity and it'll cost more to cool buildings with warmer temperatures.
  • Foods associated with Florida, like oranges and shrimp, may not be able to survive the climate change. Warming waters may destroy the shrimp's habitat and land reduction and warmth may or they may not be able to thrive due to reduction in land.
  • With warmer waters, marine habitats will change, coral reefs will bleach and die, popular snorkeling and diving destinations will no longer be popular for tourists.
It's not all doom in gloom. If Florida steps up to the plate to reduce greenhouse emissions, as directed by Gov. Charlie Crist's Executive Orders signed in July 2007, conditions can be stabilized. Global warming is inevitable but it can be slowed and stabilized.

G.G. has to ask, does the cost of inaction outweigh action?

No comments: